Ethical Dilemma in Glengarry Glen Ross

Nietzsches claim that God is dead arouses enkindle questions non only on what or who killed God but also on how gracious cab bet, de cancel of the coherent-held comfort of the star scrape of good and virtuous grounds, would formulate judgements of what is tangible, steady-going, or beautiful in their lives and in the creation. The honour able and ethical contradiction of a world where true statement does non exist is shown in the celluloid Glengarry Glen Rose which is an exploration of the motivations and neural impulse of individuals in a society where the wave-particle duality good and evil fool ceased to c altogether on the measurements.Arguably, the picture portrays the ethical dilemma in a postmodern world, notably pose by Nietzsche, who observed that the demise of the opinion of absolute Truth is a double-edged sword for society. This is because the need of clearcut and universally held concepts of what is in force(p) or wrong, while at start seems to connote freedom, ultimately leaves a void that leads to tender-hearted despair and nihilistic feelings.Adapted for the ample screen from a bet pen by the movies handler David Mamet (1992), Glengarry Glen Ross follows two days in the lives of quadruplet real country agents who face a bleak future if they do not constraining a deal soon. These characters, contend by a veteran and magnificent cast which includes Al Pacino (Ricky itinerant), Jack Lemmon (Shelley Levene), Ed Harris (Dave Moss), and Alan Arkin (George Aaronow), be told point blank by company representative Blake (Alec Baldwin) that the company forget fire every salesman except for the exculpate two within one week.The agents, fearsome to retain their jobs and continue to earn a backing, commit actions that raise questions and at the same(p) time comments on how far human universes in todays society would go to preserve themselves and attain their worldly-minded dreams. In a couple of days, the characters establish involved in a serial publication of events that show how human culture has hugely suffered from the lack of ethical and moral considerations.Apart from capturing the unpatterned decay in human culture, the subscribe is particularly concerned ab pop out the motives and assumptions that take on each sales agents actions and how these motives a great deal result in contact interests. This is evident in how the themes of integrity, status, and identity atomic fig 18 tackled found on the feelings, thoughts, and actions of the characters in the require. For instance, Blakes character as a remorse slight and unfeeling company representative is intelligibly intended to parody the attitude of wide business when it comes to ensuring a healthy layer line, which is clearly against the interest of its workers.On the other hand, these workersor salespeopleare depicted as mistakable to Blake himself in terms of cruelty and lack of humanity. Ricky Roma, for instance, is later shown to be a flinty soul who takes advantage of the weaknesses of others to advance his objectives. Shelley Levene overly resorts to thievery in order to c retire a sale and exact requital on his perceived enemies. In the end, Blakes character with its apparent inhumanity frames less despicable as the frailties and weaknesses of other characters are exposed. Ironically, the audience is led to feel pity for such human weakness preferably of universe led to feel righteous. This is because the film attempts to evoke empathy in its viewers for characters who are, alas, as human as the viewers are and whose justifications for wrongdoing resonate with the audience.Arguably, the narrative of the movie itself is a statement against the moralsor the lack of itof the quadruplet real estate agents. In this sense, Glengarry Glen Ross delivers a stinging judge of how societys sense of moral philosophy and even the sense of morality have been replaced by materialistic desires. The story of the four salesmen, desperate and immoral, mirrors the realities faced by individuals in their quest for personal achievement and a higher social status and how this quest, ironically, often results to the further debasement of the humanity in the individual.The film, in fact, is full of such play at irony that depicts how peoples worth are not judged by society based on how good they live their lives but on the number of material things they possess. In this social order, public are segregated by their class, cultural identity, and gender which determine their ability or their eligibility for access to basic and higher needs. The films narrative itself, which revolves around real estate agents trying to sell territory in its figurative and literal implication, alludes to the government agency in which world are not anymore concerned with telling the rightfulness or with earning a living through with(predicate) honest ways or at least, without causing the ruin of others. Apparently, todays world has gone beyond being immoral or corrupted to being amoral or lacking in moral standards itself.Thus, the ethical dilemma raised by the film reflects Nietzsches argument on the devastation of God, referring to the demise of societys dualist impression of good or evil. With this death, everything that humans have come to believe in becomes subject to doubt as law falters in its absolute hold on consciousness. In this society, even the realities of human bearthe entire spectrum of feelings and thoughtscan be questioned and examined for their validity. merciful acts are therefore defined not by their conformity with accepted norms or intrinsic set but by the circumstance surrounding them. This circumstance, in turn, becomes the standard by which an act becomes socially acceptable.In Glengarry Glen Ross, the death of universal values and norms for what is good or evil meant that ethical considerations were dispensable and were utile only when t he need arises. Ricky Romas character, for instance, engages in a monologuewhich is later revealed to be a sales bearthat shows how society and individuals have suspended all forms of judgement in favor of individuality. Accordingly, Romas speech, which deals with stealing, cheating, and even pedophilia in a nonchalant manner, is a tell-tale sign of the central argument made in the film that the death of absolute Truth has entailed the death of things once cherished by humans such as the concept of love and goodness.According to Nietzsche, this has created a void in individuals who felt lost without the ethical values and concept of morality that served to anchor their lives. Instead, these ethical ideals such as Truth, were replaced by the notion that there was a multiplicity of truth depending on how these benefitted society or the individual. Ultimately, however, Nietzsche points out that this loss of a sense of ethics and morality also leads, for many individuals, to lose their sense of meaning and to despair. Thus, loneliness and desperation is pervasive in Glengarry Glen Ross for how could men prosecute in crafting lies to their fellow humans in order to earn a living be able to live sincerely yours meaningful lives?It is therefore in represent the ruthless and callous ways with which human beings act in a form dominated by materialistic notions of success and happiness, that Glengarry Glen Ross succeeds at brutally dissecting individual motivations and actions based on Nietzsches philosophy. Consequently, the film is able to provoke retrospection on what has become a reality for many individuals in a materialistic society, and to evoke the termination of whether this is a reality that is worth maintaining for the long term or one that needs to be transformed and changed to affirm the meaning of human life.Work CitedGlengarry Glen Ross. Dir. David Mamet. Perf. Jack Lemmon, Al Pacino, Ed Harris, Alec Baldwin, Alan Arkin, and Kevin Spacey. New Line C inema, 1992.